| Pages: [1] 2 |
1. invul field sound effects - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Yes please.
- by Wang Jing - at 2009.07.01 19:37:00
|
2. Ishkur, why no drone dmg bonus? - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Check out my proposal in the Assembly Hall to give all Assault Frigates a 4th Bonus: http://www.eveonline.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=1053166 On the subject of the Ishkur, in my opinion its above and beyond the best AF already, giving...
- by Wang Jing - at 2009.06.28 11:10:00
|
3. [small] T2 ammo boost ideas - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Removing the tracking penalities from the close range, high damage ammos would be a good start. What use is close range ammo if you cant hit anything with it?? The cap penalties and stuff they have are enough of a drawback.
- by Wang Jing - at 2009.06.02 12:37:00
|
4. making anti-piracy a real job - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Wang Jing on 27/05/2009 11:15:07 As for security status gains, I'm all for this. My suggestion would be that it is again linked to ships, on the basis of size, with rookie ships excluded of course. First of all, and most important,...
- by Wang Jing - at 2009.05.27 11:14:00
|
5. making anti-piracy a real job - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Wang Jing on 27/05/2009 11:01:05 A complete revamp of the bounty system is needed. A way of doing it that is thrown around a lot is to link payouts to the cost of a ship loss, in a way that prevents it being profitable to claim your...
- by Wang Jing - at 2009.05.27 10:59:00
|
6. Faction Battlecruisers - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Everyone complains that the tier 1 BCs are underpowered, so perhaps faction BCs can be based on these rather than the tier 2s that get all the loving. Of course what I really want is a new model Angels BC in the style of the Machariel
- by Wang Jing - at 2009.05.08 12:25:00
|
7. Balancing - ECM Drones - Discussion thread - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
The fact that people actually use ECM drones isn't something to be afraid of. They may be a bit overpowered in 1vs1s, so a little balancing is in order, but do we really want to have a situation where everyone uses damage drones, with no exception...
- by Wang Jing - at 2009.04.24 12:03:00
|
8. Balancing - Identifying problems - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Brace for epic rage threads when whatever important issue is completely ignored. (I know mine will be )
- by Wang Jing - at 2009.04.22 17:10:00
|
9. Balancing - Identifying problems - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Seishi Maru Come on Nozh .. i am F5 ing this forum like mad in antecipation for the discussion threads :) I wonder if Nozh is based in Iceland or US... we've got a long wait if hes on US time.
- by Wang Jing - at 2009.04.22 15:52:00
|
10. Balancing - Identifying problems - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Wang Jing on 17/04/2009 16:35:49 Seishi Maru - Yeah there were a few "boost the hawk!" votes that i included in my count. A 4th bonus would certainly help with that
- by Wang Jing - at 2009.04.17 16:35:00
|
11. Balancing - Identifying problems - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Seishi Maru Edited by: Seishi Maru on 17/04/2009 16:22:26 I counted for you ... Counted only things that appeared more than just 1 or 2 times LEvel 4 missions - 16 Ewar rebalance (include drones) 25 Large AC 24 (wh...
- by Wang Jing - at 2009.04.17 16:26:00
|
12. Balancing - Identifying problems - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: CCP Nozh Good stuff, keep it coming. I haven't counted or anything but the main issues seem to be: ECM - Mainly ECM Drones Tech 2 Ammo Rockets Blasters Large Artillery Remember no discussions here, and try t...
- by Wang Jing - at 2009.04.17 15:42:00
|
13. Assault Frigs deserve their second bonus! - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Gibly OR give it a drone control range bonus 5km per level I suppose. that way you could have even more range if you are willing to make theese sacrifices The latter idea sounds pretty cool and definitly suits the ship....
- by Wang Jing - at 2009.04.17 15:12:00
|
14. Assault Frigs deserve their second bonus! - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Bogu D I agree that the AS could use there old 4th bonus. But... if you truly want to differentiate the 2 types for each race, why not give one of them some bonus to RR? Either a cap use reduction or rep amount bonus. That w...
- by Wang Jing - at 2009.04.17 14:07:00
|
15. Assault Frigs deserve their second bonus! - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Thanks for the replies so far! Some great contributions. If you guys feel strongly enough about this, why not post with it as one of your priorities in the new Dev Thread for balance priorities: http://www.eveonline.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&t...
- by Wang Jing - at 2009.04.17 11:25:00
|
16. Balancing - Identifying problems - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Wang Jing on 17/04/2009 11:18:22 1) Faction ships, other than the Sanshas, need to be updated, as many suffer from huge fitting problems, or awful bonuses/slots (i.e. the dramiel with 3 turret bonuses yet only 2 out of 5 high slots ...
- by Wang Jing - at 2009.04.17 11:18:00
|
17. Assault Frigs deserve their second bonus! - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Sturdy Girl Edited by: Sturdy Girl on 16/04/2009 13:19:34 Surely the Jag deserves the tracking bonus more than the Wolf; it moves a hell of a lot faster. With an afterburner running they both move fast enough to need...
- by Wang Jing - at 2009.04.16 13:25:00
|
18. Assault Frigs deserve their second bonus! - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Rodamus Zero Originally by: Wang Jing Edited by: Wang Jing on 16/04/2009 09:37:49 Edited by: Wang Jing on 16/04/2009 09:30:26 Edited by: Wang Jing on 16/04/2009 09:23:40 Originally by: Rodamus Zero...
- by Wang Jing - at 2009.04.16 13:17:00
|
19. Assault Frigs deserve their second bonus! - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Kage Bunshin I prefer an afterburner speed bonus on assault frigs, 10% per level i think but 5 will also be good Good idea, but very little point for the wolf/jag until they get their delicious rifter tracking bonus, g...
- by Wang Jing - at 2009.04.16 11:10:00
|
20. Assault Frigs deserve their second bonus! - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Rodamus Zero The Wolf, being from Boundless Creations warfare ideology of GUNS GUNS GUNS GUNS GUNS may suit a tracking bonus over "just more damage". Jaguar might as well have a launcher bonus, the term "Versatily" is a s...
- by Wang Jing - at 2009.04.16 09:04:00
|
| Pages: [1] 2 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |